PFS

In locally advanced, unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC following CRT

TAGRISSO demonstrated an almost sevenfold increase in median PFS following CRT1

TAGRISSO is the first and only targeted treatment/EGFR TKI in unresectable stage III NSCLC1

84%

reduction in risk of progression or death vs placebo

39.1 months mPFS with TAGRISSO
(95% CI: 31.5, NE) vs
5.6 months mPFS
with placebo (95% CI: 3.7, 7.4)
HR=0.16 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.24); P<0.001; N=2161

PFS RATES AT 12 MONTHS AND 24 MONTHS2

Time TAGRISSO Placebo
12 months 74% (95% CI: 65, 80) 22% (95% CI: 13, 32)
24 months 65% (95% CI: 56, 73) 13%(95% CI: 6, 22)

PFS rates were not powered to show
statistical significance.

  • Data maturity was 56% at time of analysis (120 targeted events)2
  • In a sensitivity analysis of PFS by investigator assessment, median PFS was 38.9 months (95% CI: 26.7, NC) for TAGRISSO and 7.3 months (95% CI: 5.5, 10.3) for placebo. HR=0.19 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.29); N=2163 — The sensitivity analysis was consistent with BICR assessment. It was not powered to show statistical significance
    • The sensitivity analysis was consistent with BICR assessment. It was not powered to show statistical significance

NCCN
CATEGORY 1
RECOMMENDATION

Osimertinib (TAGRISSO) following CRT is an NCCN Category 1 recommendation for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who have an EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation.4‡§

NCCN Category 1 Recommendation icon

Osimertinib (TAGRISSO) following CRT is an NCCN Category 1 recommendation for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who have an EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation.4‡§

See the NCCN Guidelines® for detailed recommendations, including other treatment options.4

§Osimertinib is recommended as consolidation therapy for patients with unresectable stage III (Category 1) EGFRm (exon 19 deletion, exon 21 L858R mutation) NSCLC with PS 0-1 and no disease progression after definitive concurrent chemoradiation.4

In locally advanced, unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC following CRT

TAGRISSO demonstrated consistent PFS results across most prespecified patient subgroups2

PFS results in prespecified patient subgroups
PFS results in prespecified patient subgroups
  • The exploratory analysis of prespecified patient subgroups was not powered to show statistical significance

In locally advanced, unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC following CRT

Interim overall survival analysis5

EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS: NEW CNS LESIONS1


 
  • 40

  • 30

  • 20

  • 10

  •  0

Patients with new lesions (%)

TAGRISSO

12%

(17/143)

Placebo

36%

(26/73)

EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS: NEW CNS LESIONS1

OS data were immature at this interim analysis (31% maturity).
The final OS analysis has not yet been formally tested for statistical significance.

  • Median duration of follow-up for OS (censored patients) was 42.6 months in the TAGRISSO arm and 37.5 months in the placebo arm
  • As crossover was allowed in LAURA, among the 69 patients who discontinued treatment in the placebo arm, 78% received subsequent treatment with TAGRISSO

*Secondary endpoint in the LAURA trial.

In locally advanced, unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC following CRT

Interim CNS progression-free survival results6

EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS: NEW CNS LESIONS1


 
  • 40

  • 30

  • 20

  • 10

  •  0

Patients with new lesions (%)

TAGRISSO

12%

(17/143)

Placebo

36%

(26/73)

EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS: NEW CNS LESIONS1

This was a prespecified interim analysis and has not yet been tested for statistical significance.

  • Data maturity was 27% at the time of analysis6
  • To control for the type I error rate, a sequential multiple testing procedure was used for PFS (primary endpoint), OS, and CNS PFS. At this analysis, CNS PFS could not be formally tested for statistical significance because the interim analysis of OS data did not reach statistical significance at a maturity of 20%6
  • All patients underwent MRI brain scans at baseline and at each follow-up during the study. Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks until week 48, and then every 12 weeks, until BICR-assessed progression1,6
  • Median duration of follow-up for CNS PFS was 24.6 months (range: 0.0, 60.6) in the TAGRISSO arm and 5.7 months (range: 0.0, 55.1) in the placebo arm6
  • CNS PFS was defined as the time from randomization until the earliest date of CNS objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of CNS progression) regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy before CNS progression6

In locally advanced, unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC following CRT

Time to distant metastases or death results6

EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS: NEW CNS LESIONS1


 
  • 40

  • 30

  • 20

  • 10

  •  0

Patients with new lesions (%)

TAGRISSO

12%

(17/143)

Placebo

36%

(26/73)

EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS: NEW CNS LESIONS1

This was a prespecified exploratory analysis and was not powered to show statistical significance.

  • TTDM was defined as the time from randomization until the first date of distant metastases or date of death in the absence of distant metastases6
  • Distant metastases were defined as any new lesions detected on a scan that were anywhere other than the lungs or regional lymph nodes according to RECIST 1.16
  • Median duration of follow-up for TTDM in all patients was 24.8 months (range: 0.0, 60.6) in the TAGRISSO arm and 7.2 months (range: 0.0, 55.1) in the placebo arm6
  • All patients underwent MRI brain scans at baseline and at each follow-up during the study. Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks until week 48, and then every 12 weeks, until BICR-assessed progression1,6

In locally advanced, unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC following CRT

LAURA: A global, double-blind, randomized, phase 3 trial in patients with unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC following concurrent or sequential CRT1,7

LAURA clinical study designLAURA clinical study design

Stratification factors1
  • Prior chemoradiation strategy (cCRT vs sCRT)
  • Tumor stage prior to chemoradiation (IIIA vs IIIB/IIIC)
  • Region (China vs rest of the world)
Following CRT1,7
  • Patients whose disease did not progress during or following CRT were eligible for randomization
  • After CRT completion, every patient received baseline CT scan and/or MRI ≤28 days prior to randomization
  • Tumor assessment at baseline, every 8 weeks until 48 weeks, then every 12 weeks until progression

Crossover from placebo to open-label TAGRISSO was allowed for patients following disease progression1

  • Patients received either concurrent or sequential CRT—including ≥2 cycles every 3 weeks or 5 weekly doses of platinum-based chemotherapy and a total dose of radiation of 60 Gy±10% (54 to 66 Gy)—prior to randomization1,7

Primary endpoint: PFS as assessed by BICR (blinded independent central review) per RECIST 1.11

Key secondary endpoints: OS, CNS PFS, ORR, and DoR2

Key exclusion criteria: History of ILD prior to CRT; symptomatic pneumonitis following CRT; QT prolongation or any clinically important abnormalities in rhythm, conduction, or morphology of resting ECG; any factors that increase the risk of QT prolongation; prior treatment with an EGFR TKI, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or investigational agents for NSCLC outside of that received in the definitive setting for stage III disease as part of CRT7

LAURA included patients with a wide range of clinicopathologic features2

*One patient in the TAGRISSO arm underwent randomization without an approved positive local or central EGFR test result.

Did not meet progressive disease criteria and were not measurable after CRT.

Test every eligible patient for EGFR mutations to help target and treat the driver of disease

It is critical to test every patient with unresectable stage III NSCLC for EGFR mutations

test-icon

TEST

every eligible patient for
EGFR mutations

know-icon

KNOW

mutation status to help
inform treatment
decisions

treat-icon

TREAT

eligible patients with
unresectable stage III EGFRm
NSCLC with TAGRISSO1

Pill image is not actual size.

Strong partnerships across the MDT as well as reflexive molecular testing have been shown to help guide
appropriate treatment for eligible patients across stages of NSCLC and can help decrease turnaround times.8

  • Adoption of reflex testing at diagnosis significantly reduced turnaround time for molecular testing results by
    ~37 days on average in a retrospective cohort study, including 166 newly diagnosed patients with NSCLC of any pathologic stage; P=0.00029*

*Based on a single-center, retrospective study of 220 patients, including 166 patients with newly diagnosed lung adenocarcinoma whose specimens were received for molecular testing over a 3-year period between 2016 and 2018. In 2016, 39 patients had non-reflex ordered testing with an average turnaround time of 52.6 days. In 2017 and 2018, 127 patients and 54 patients, respectively, had reflex-ordered testing at diagnosis with an average turnaround time of 26.5 days and 15.6 days, respectively. Reflex-ordered biomarker testing included EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, and ERBB2 gene mutations; MET exon 14 skipping; ALK, RET, and ROS1 gene rearrangements; MET gene amplification; and PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry.9

 

Loading......

Eligible patients with unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC have an option for targeted therapy

TAGRISSO continues to address treatment gaps across the EGFRm NSCLC landscape1